Method and apparatus for improving performance

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates generally to a training method and apparatus for improving performance.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to a method and apparatus forimproving performance.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Training methods, or programs, are used to improve performance innumerous endeavors, be they individual athletic endeavors with equipment(e.g., throwing, weight lifting, etc.) or individual athletic endeavorswithout equipment (e.g., running, jumping, swimming, etc.), teamathletic endeavors (e.g., baseball, soccer, etc.), mental endeavors(e.g., IQ testing, memory recall, mental calculations, trivia games,etc.), or emotional endeavors (e.g., acting, presenting, competition,etc.). Typically, the individual trains by performing for a fixeddistance or a fixed quantity. For example, a swimmer may swim for 100meters or a runner may run for a mile or a weightlifter may bench press250 pounds or a mathematician may calculate 100 sums or a presentermaintains a peak emotional state in the face of adversity for a fixedtime. An individual repeats the fixed distances or quantities andattempts to reduce the time required to travel fixed distances orcomplete the fixed quantity of mental calculations or achieve theemotional state during the physical and/or mental activities.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method of training based uponcontinuous variables (e.g., distance, time duration, weight gradient,etc.) rather than upon discrete variables (e.g., a fixed mark, fixedrepetitions, etc.). The individual is trained to produce a level ofperformance (e.g., energy, thrust, speed, mental tasks, etc.) for alength of the continuous variable (which may actually be discrete, butthen is unfixed), such as time, which is constantly challenged.Gradually, the individual is able to produce the same level ofperformance over improved periods of the continuous variable, say time,for activities such as running and swimming or produce the same level ofperformance with shorter periods of rest between activities such asrepetitions of lifting weight or produce the same activity in a shortertime like calculating a quantity of mathematical sums. Ultimately, theprinciple applied with this new method of improving performance, whichis deemed “Raniere's Maximal Efficiency Principle” or “Raniere's Law”,is where the characteristic or variable to be trained is, optimally,continuously challenged. For example, if your performance improvementgoal is for runners to run longer distances, then you continuouslychallenge distance (e.g., try to beat the last, longest distance ran).Similarly, if your performance improvement goal is for greater speed,then you continuously challenge speed (e.g., as on a treadmill). Then,if your performance improvement goal is for speed over distance (i.e.,speed for a length of time) then you continuously challenge the lengthof time at a speed (e.g., as on a treadmill).

A first general aspect of the present invention provides a methodcomprising:

determining if a subject is trainable with respect to the performance ofa given activity;

determining a point of efficiency of a subject with respect to at leastone parameter; and

exerting the subject at or near the point of efficiency until a state ofinefficiency with respect to the at least one parameter or exhaustionoccurs.

A second general aspect of the present invention provides a methodcomprising:

taking a measurement relating to at least one continuous variable that asubject may remain in a state of accommodation; and training the subjectso the value of the measurement of the at least one continuous variablechanges.

A third general aspect of the present invention provides a methodcomprising:

providing a performance system;

activating the performance system;

recording at least one parameter of the performance system;

measuring the at least one parameter of a subject;

determining an at least one point of efficiency parameter by changingthe at least one parameter of the performance system until the at leastone parameter of the subject substantially changes beyond a giventolerance function; and

training the subject at or near the point of efficiency so the durationthe subject can maintain the point of efficiency changes withoutchanging the parameter.

A fourth general aspect of the present invention provides an apparatuscomprising:

a performance system;

at least one sensor for measuring at least one parameter of a subjectbeing trained or measured by the performance system; and

a control system for controlling the at least one parameter of theperformance system and for acquiring the at least one parameter datafrom the at least one sensor.

The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will beapparent from the following more particular descriptions of preferredembodiments of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features of the present invention will best be understood from adetailed description of specific embodiments of the invention selectedfor the purposes of illustration and shown in the accompanying drawingsin which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a specific athletic (running)performance system, within the scope of the present invention;

FIG. 2A illustrates an approximate graph of a physical parameter versusa speed parameter of this performance system (a treadmill), within thescope of the present invention;

FIG. 2B illustrates an approximate graph of a turnover rate versus aspeed parameter of this performance system (a treadmill), within thescope of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a graph of a physical parameter versus a length oftime at a given speed, within the scope of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic view of determining a point of efficiencyspeed for a specific embodiment related to running, within the scope ofthe present invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates a schematic view of determining a length of timewhich a runner remains in a state of accommodation for a specificembodiment related to running, within the scope of the presentinvention; and,

FIG. 6 illustrates a general diagram of the performance system employedby the method and apparatus, in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Although certain specific embodiments of the present invention will beshown and described in detail, it should be understood thatgeneralizations and various changes and modifications may be madewithout departing from the scope of the appended claims. The scope ofthe present invention will in no way be limited to the number ofconstituting components, the materials thereof, the shapes thereof, therelative arrangement thereof, etc. Some features of the presentinvention are illustrated in detail in the accompanying drawings,wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout thedrawings. Although the drawings are intended to illustrate an embodimentof the present invention, the drawings are not necessarily drawn toscale.

The following are definitions that pertain to the subject invention:

Computer: Any device that directly or indirectly performs arithmeticoperations and/or comparisons on numbers;

Variable: Any measurable quantity, quality, or property thathypothetically, or actually, can change over time; Subject: Anythingthat has at least one measurable quantity, quality, or property;

Characteristic: A measurable quantity, quality, or property associatedwith a specific subject;

Parameter: Any characteristic used as a reference;

Performance: An effect measurement taken on a subject under specificcause conditions;

Activity: Anything from which you can derive performance;

Training: Stimuli used to affect performance; and

Trainable: Affected by training.

FIG. 6 illustrates a general diagram outlining the overall system thatboth the method and apparatus of the present invention employ. A subject18 interacts with a system 10. The system 10 has been termed variously atraining system, measuring system, or performance system. There is aninteraction, or communication 3, between the subject 18 and the trainingsystem 10. The subject 18, sends to the training system 10, at least oneparameter 34. The at least one parameter 34 is measured. In return, thetraining system 10, returns to the subject 18 a system parameter 4. Thesystem parameter 4 is controlled. The training system 10 has both inputs7, and outputs 6. The subject 18 needs only to be any trainable entity.A trainable subject 18 is an entity that both responds or measures insome way an external environmental effect on the entity; and, then thesubject 18 has some capability of retaining memory of the cumulation ofthese external environmental effects. Thus, the subject 18 may be anindividual human, a team or group of humans such as a running team, ananimal, a group of animals, a cellular automata, a group of cellularautomata, a virus programs, microorganism cultures, microbes, plants, apiece of material, a computer program and data, etc.

FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of one specific, performancesystem 10 of the present invention, in this case, being utilized forrunners. The performance system 10 includes a treadmill apparatus 12 anda control system 14. Optionally, the performance system 10 may be, interalia, a stair stepping machine, bicycle, stationary bicycle, swimmingpool, weightlifting apparatuses, other aerobic exercise devices, oremotional or mental exercise devices such as computer learning system,emotion trigger system, mental performance system, and biofeedbackmachine. The treadmill apparatus includes a belt 16 that a subject 18may run on. The treadmill apparatus 12 may also include an interfacedevice 20 mounted on a support 22 of the treadmill apparatus 12. Thecontrol system 14 may include, inter alia, a computer 24, a dataacquisition system 26, a memory device 28, a display device 32, and anoutput port 30. At least one physical, emotional, or mental parameter 34of the subject 18 is gathered by at least one sensor 36. The at leastone physical, emotional, or mental parameter 34 may include any suitablemeasurement (e.g., running turnover rate, stride length, stride strikeforce, muscle contraction speed, muscle contraction profile, musclecontraction strength, body temperature, heat given off, blood pressureheart rate, heart beat strength, respiration rate, VO₂, perspirationrate, metabolic rate, blood flow, breathing rate, breath length, breathcapacity, blood pressure, VO₂, ability to count backwards by 3accurately, etc.). It is possible that all mental and emotionalparameters can be considered to be measured by a physical parameter 34.To measure is to “sense” a difference with at least one of the fivesenses. Thereby, all emotional, thought, or other parameters 34 need tobe reducible to a physical signal (e.g., signal “sensed” by one of thefive senses) in order to be measured. A cable 38 connects the at leastone sensor 36 to the interface device 20. A cable 40 connects theinterface device 20 with the control system 14. In this embodiment, thecomputer 24 controls the data acquisition system 26 and the dataacquisition system 26 acquires the physical parameter 34 from the atleast one sensor 36 through the cable 38, through the interface device20, and through the cable 40. The computer 24 may control the speed ofthe belt 16 on the treadmill apparatus 12 by sending speed commands(i.e., system parameters) through a cable 42. The computer 24 stores thephysical parameter 34 and treadmill speed 66 (FIG. 2A) data in thememory device 28. An operator may send input commands to the computer 24through any suitable input device such as a keyboard 44, a mouse 46, akeypad 48, voice recognition system (not shown), etc. The interfacedevice 20 may include, inter alia, a display screen 50 and a pluralityof buttons 52. The buttons 52 allow the subject 18 to input commands tothe control system 14. The display screen 50 displays information, suchas treadmill speed 66 (FIG. 2A) and physical parameters 34, to thesubject 18. Additionally, the display device 32 displays information(e.g., treadmill speed 66 (FIG. 2A), physical parameters 34, charts,graphs, etc.). A cable 54 connects the output port 30 with a remotecomputer 56. The computer 24 of the control system 14 may send data fromthe memory device 28 to the remote computer 56. A cable 58 may connectthe output port 30 with a printer 60. The computer 24 sends data fromthe memory device 28 to the printer 60. The printer 60 prints andprovides a hard copy 62 of data to an operator. In lieu of any of thecables 58, the system may transmit data via wireless technology (e.g.,radio frequency, infra red, acoustic, etc.).

FIG. 2A illustrates a graph of the parameter 34 versus a speed of atreadmill 66. As mentioned above, the parameter 34, which can be aphysical, emotional, or mental parameter, may include any suitablemeasurement of (e.g., heart rate, turnover rate, respiration rate, bloodpressure, VO₂, etc.) of a subject 18. The turnover rate is the number oftimes each foot 64A, 64B of the subject 18 strikes the belt 16 of thetreadmill 12 per minute. VO₂ is the oxygen capacity of the body of thesubject 18. The graph of FIG. 2A illustrates the treadmill speed 66being increased while a physical parameter 34, such as heart rate, ismeasured. In this example, as the treadmill speed 66 is increased, theheart rate varies approximately (within tolerance) linearly withtreadmill speed in a state of accommodation 68. A state of accommodation68, as FIG. 2A depicts, is the value at which the physical parameter 34does not notably change in variation beyond a given tolerance. In thestate of accommodation 68, the subject 18 is adjusting to the treadmillspeed 66 without being overly stressed. As the treadmill speed 66 isincreased, a point of efficiency 70 is reached. As the treadmill speed66 is increased beyond the point of efficiency 70, the physicalparameter 34 (e.g., heart rate, etc.) notably changes along the graphline 72. Just beyond the point of efficiency 70, the subject's 18 bodyand/or emotions and mind, measured through the body, no longer canaccommodate additional stress and enters a state of inefficiency causingthe physical parameters 34 to vary differently (e.g., more rapidlychange, less rapidly change) than before. As the subject 18 trains, thepoint of efficiency 70 moves to higher and higher speeds as illustratedin the point of efficiencies 70C, and 70D (FIG. 2A). Thus, the point ofefficiency 70 is the maximum value of, in the case of FIG. 2A, the speedof the treadmill whereby the state of accommodation is maintained.

FIG. 2B illustrates a graph comparing a parameter 34, in this case,turnover rate versus the speed of the treadmill 66. In this case, theturnover rate varies proportionally with the speed of the treadmill 66,within certain pre-determined tolerances. At a certain turnover rate apoint of efficiency 70 is reached. Beyond the point of efficiency 70 theturnover rate is longer in the same proportion to the speed of thetreadmill 66. That is the turnover rate is accelerating, ordeaccelerating, compared to treadmill speed 66. As training is continuedwith this method, however, the point of efficiency 70 is increased tofurther new points of efficiency 70C, 70D.

FIG. 3 illustrates a graph of the parameter 34 versus time 74. In thisexample, the treadmill speed 66 is maintained at a constant speed forexercising the subject 18. For a length of time denoted “T”, thephysical parameter 34, such as respiration rate, remains substantiallylinear, within a predetermined tolerance. In this state of accommodation68A, the subject's body 18 is adjusting to the stress of exercising overthe length of time 74. As time increases, a point of efficiency 70A isreached. For exercise beyond this point of efficiency 70A, the physicalparameters 34 notably change along the graph line 72A. Above the pointof efficiency 70A, the subject 18 no longer can accommodate additionalstress and enters a state of inefficiency causing the physicalparameters 34 to markedly change. The speed of the treadmill now drivesthe graph (i.e., point of inefficiency is driven by machine parametervariation). Note that sometimes the state of inefficiency can simply bethe inability to continue the activity, by setting the tolerance wideenough. This is often the case with running (i.e., runner must stop) orweight training (i.e., weight can no longer be lifted). As the subject18 trains and builds up more capacity, the point of efficiency 70A movesto, in this case, longer and longer lengths of times 74 (i.e., moves insome direction along the parameter graph) as illustrated in point ofefficiencies 70E, and 70F. For the physical parameter 34 to markedly ornotably change, the physical parameter 34 is no longer consistent orsubstantially consistent. For the physical parameter 34 to remainconsistent or substantially consistent, the physical parameter 34 muststay within certain predefined, possibly parameter variation-related,tolerances. Depending on which physical parameter 34 is being measured,the predefined tolerance may vary. For example, the tolerance may be setat +/−2% of the value of the physical parameter 34. Thus, in theaforementioned example, as long as the physical parameter 34 stayswithin +/−2% of a value, the subject 18 is still within a state ofaccommodation 68. These tolerances can also be functions of time. In analternative embodiment, the training may results in a shortening of thelength of time that the subject is in a state of accommodation 68. Forexample, in weightlifting, the time the body needs to rest andrecuperate between lifting sets would be shortened through successivetraining.

FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic view of determining the point ofefficiency 70 for treadmill speed 66. In step 78, the subject 18, suchas a runner, is placed on the belt 16 of the treadmill apparatus 12. Instep 80, an initial treadmill speed 66B is set. In step 82, ameasurement is taken of an initial physical parameter 34 (e.g., heartrate, turnover rate, respiration rate, VO₂, etc.). In step 84, the speedof the treadmill 66 is increased. In step 86, the data acquisitionsystem 26 of the control system 14 measures a current physical parameter34B. In step 88, the control system 14 determines if the currentphysical parameter 34B is outside the tolerance function. The computer24 may perform this determination. If the current physical parameter 34Bis not outside the tolerance function, the method returns to step 84where the treadmill speed 66 is further increased. If the currentphysical parameter 34B is outside the tolerance function, then themethod continues in step 90. In step 90, the control system 14 records apoint of efficiency speed 92, and stores the point of efficiency speed92 in the memory device 28. The point of efficiency speed 92 is thetreadmill speed 66 that corresponds to the point of efficiency 70 asillustrated in FIG. 2A. The method continues in step 94. In step 94 thetreadmill apparatus 12 can be stopped and the subject 18 stops running.The point of efficiency is just a benchmark.

FIG. 5 illustrates a schematic view of determining a length of time 74in which a runner 18 remains in a state of accommodation 68A. In step96, the runner is placed on the treadmill apparatus 12. In step 98, thetreadmill speed 66 is set at, or around, the point of efficiency speed92 which was determined in step 90 (FIG. 4). In step 100, the controlsystem 14 measures an initial physical parameter 34C. In step 102, thecontrol system 14 starts a timer 104 to measure elapsed time. In step106, the timer 104 and the treadmill apparatus 12 continue to run. Instep 108, a current physical parameter 34D is measured by the controlsystem 14. In step 110, the control system 14 determines if the currentphysical parameter 34D is outside the tolerance function. The computer24 of the control system 14 performs this determination by comparing thetolerance function with the current physical parameter 34D. If thecurrent physical parameter 34D is not outside the tolerance function,the method returns to step 106 where the timer 104 continues to run. Ifthe current physical parameter 34D is outside the tolerance function,the method continues in step 112. In step 112, the control system 14stops the timer 104 and records the length of time “T” in which thesubject 18 remained in the state accommodation 68A as illustrated inFIG. 3. Note, again, that inefficiency can be at exhaustion and may besignaled by subject 18.

The subject 18 is further trained by repeating steps 96 through 112 ofFIG. 5. Over a period of time, the subject 18 is able to produce aspecific level of performance over an improved period of time. As thesubject 18 trains and builds up more capacity, the point of efficiency70A moves to longer and longer lengths of times 74 as illustrated inpoint of efficiencies 70E, and 70F (FIG. 3). The subject 18 may alsoable to run longer in inefficiency and longer overall. Alternatively,the subject 18 can also train and build up more capacity, but due to theparticular activity can shorten length of time 74 that the point ofefficiency 70A is reached. For example, with weight lifting (e.g.,twenty repetitions at a particular weight), the point of efficiency 70Ais shortened through the use of the method.

Although the training program for improving performance of the presentinvention described above describes a method and apparatus for improvinghuman performances in various athletic, running activities, it should beclear to one of ordinary skill in the art that the training program ofthe present invention is also useful for training and improvingperformance for other subjects 18 such as animals (e.g., race horses,racing dogs, performance dogs, etc.), viruses, cellular automata, etc.and also improving other physical, emotional, or mental areas.

Another example of an embodiment of the invention would be for thesubject 18 to be a human performing mathematical calculations. Themathematical calculations could be, in this embodiment, a person addingmathematical sums. A specific goal could be, for example, the subject 18is attempting add 100 sums as quickly as possible. The measuring system10 in this embodiment could be a training machine display the sums to becalculated by the subject 18 one at a time, at a given rate (i.e.,analogous to treadmill speed in the running embodiment). The rate ofdelivering the sums to the subject 18 is increased until the subject 18cannot answer the sum before the next sum is displayed. By way ofexample, if the subject's 18 point of efficiency is found to be 1 sumper second and the subject 18 can only answer 10 sums before failure,the subject 18 is trained at that rate. The subject 18 is then trainedat that rate so that the subject 18 can increase the total number ofsums completed (e.g., 15 sums, 25 sums, 50 sums, etc.). Once, forexample, the subject 18 can perform 100 sums at the rate of 1 sum persecond, then a new point of efficiency is located. Thus, training wouldthen be conducted at the rate of, for example, 0.75 sums per second.

Similar to the mathematician in the above mentioned embodiment, aweightlifter, for example, would, upon using this method for a period oftime, also shorten the time between repetitions (i.e. “reps”) of liftingweights. Thus, rather than increasing the amount of weight lifted as aresult of training, the weightlifter would be able to shorten the time,both total, and between successive reps of lifting the same amount ofweight during training.

Another example of an embodiment of this invention allows for theoptimal training of microbes to evolve to be resistant to a hostileenvironmental factor. The microbial culture (i.e. subject 18) is exposedto increasing levels of a hostile environmental factor until a dramaticchange in the die-off of the culture happens. The point of efficiency70, which is this point, is where the culture will be optimallyadaptive. Future generations of the microbial culture are exposed to theenvironmental factor at the point of efficiency 70 until the culture issubstantially unaffected. A new point of efficiency 70 is found bycomparing the current effect to an original efficiency graph. The newgraph is extended by increasing the amount of the hostile environmentalfactor until a new point of efficiency 70 is reached. The process isrepeated until the culture is no longer adaptive or until the culturereaches a desired level of adaptability.

Another embodiment utilizing the inventive method is for training anadaptive computer program. Similar to the aforementioned bacterialtraining, the method employed would be to find a resonance point (i.e.,the maximum output for a given input) in the system to be trained. Thetraining effect (i.e. output) is maximized for the effort expended bythe subject and trainer (i.e., input). The optimal performance can becalled the “Raniere Resonance Training Effect”.

The foregoing description of the present invention has been presentedfor purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to beexhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, andmany modifications and variations are possible in light of the aboveteaching. For example, the measurement data (e.g, physical parameters34, speed, time, etc.) may be recorded by any suitable means (e.g.,manually, chart, clipboard, etc.). Such modifications and variationsthat may be apparent to a person skilled in the art are intended to beincluded within the scope of this invention as defined by theaccompanying claims.

I claim:
 1. A method comprising: providing a performance system, theperformance system including a treadmill; providing at least one sensorfor measuring a first parameter of a subject, the first parameter beinga physical parameter of the subject being trained and measured by theperformance system, wherein the at least one sensor measures an initialmeasurement of the first parameter; providing a control system forcontrolling a second parameter, wherein the second parameter is a speedof the treadmill; setting, by the control system, an initial value forthe second parameter; determining, by the control system, a range oftolerance surrounding the initial measurement of the first parameter,the range of tolerance being ±2% of a value of the first parameter;starting a timer to measure an elapsed time of a given activity;training the trainable subject within the range of tolerance of theinitial measurement; determining, by the control system, for the givenactivity, a point of efficiency of the subject by measuring the firstparameter of the subject, the point of efficiency being a maximum valueof the second parameter whereby a state of accommodation is maintainedwith respect to the first parameter, the state of accommodation beingmaintained as long as the subject trains without the value of the firstparameter being outside of the range of tolerance, wherein the point ofefficiency is determined by repeatedly increasing stress on the subjectwithin the range of tolerance surrounding the initial measurement of thefirst parameter by controlling the second parameter until just prior tothe subject no longer being able to accommodate additional stress andentering a state of inefficiency or exhaustion; stopping the timer whenthe value of the first parameter is outside of the range of tolerance;and recording a length of time in which the trainable subject remainedin the state of accommodation until the value of the first parameter isoutside of the range of tolerance.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein thephysical parameter is selected from the group consisting of runningturnover rate, stride length, stride strike force, muscle contractionspeed, muscle contraction profile, muscle contraction strength, weightlifted, electromagnetic activity profile, chemical activity profile,body temperature, and blood pressure.
 3. The method of claim 1, whereinthe physical parameter is selected from the group consisting of heartrate, heart beat strength, respiration rate, VO₂, perspiration rate,metabolic rate, blood flow, breathing rate, heat given off, and breathlength.